In California, we often pride ourselves on having some of the most robust environmental laws in the nation. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is designed to ensure transparency, public involvement, and thoughtful decision-making.
But too often, we are seeing a troubling pattern emerge: projects that technically meet minimum notice requirements, yet fail to meaningfully engage the very stakeholders most affected.
The proposed White Rock North Mine project in Sacramento County is shaping up to be one of those cases.
The project sits adjacent to Prairie City State Vehicular Recreation Area (SVRA), one of California’s premier off-highway vehicle recreation destinations. Thousands of families, riders, and outdoor enthusiasts rely on Prairie City for safe, managed access to public lands.
Under California law, including provisions governing the Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) program, state agencies and decision-makers are expected to fully consider impacts to these types of resources.
Yet based on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), there is little evidence that early, meaningful engagement occurred with California State Parks, the OHMVR Commission, and the recreation community that uses Prairie City.
Across California, we’ve seen similar situations play out before. Projects move forward without robust stakeholder engagement. Key impacts—especially to recreation—are under-analyzed. Communities feel excluded.
Prairie City SVRA is a designated state recreation asset with a clear mandate: to provide sustainable off-highway recreation opportunities for current and future generations.
Mining operations, by their nature, can introduce impacts that extend beyond property lines—air quality, noise, water use, and user experience among them. Ignoring those interactions doesn’t make them go away; it just makes them harder to manage later.
State Parks, Sacramento County, and project proponents have an opportunity—right now—to reset the process by conducting a comprehensive recreation impact analysis, and engaging directly with State Parks and the OHMVR Commission, and bringing stakeholders into the conversation before the plan is finalized.
At its core, the White Rock Mine proposal is more than a land-use decision. It’s a test of whether California will uphold the principles that CEQA was built on: transparency, inclusion, and informed decision-making.
If we continue down the current path, we risk repeating a cycle that benefits no one. California can—and should—expect nothing less.
Don Amador authored this commentary and is a longtime public lands advocate with over 30 years of experience in recreation policy, trail stewardship, and collaborative land management and former Chair of the CA State Parks OHMVR Commission.
Copyright © 2026, Folsom Times, a digital product of All Town Media LLC. All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Support local journalism in your community
You care about your community. That’s why you and thousands of others turn to Folsom Times to stay informed, connected, and engaged with what’s happening right here at home.
Folsom Times is locally owned, locally operated, and independently run, delivering original news and feature stories across Folsom, El Dorado Hills, Rancho Cordova, and the surrounding region. Every story we publish is made possible by the support of our paid advertising partners, whose investment goes directly back into our newsroom to keep hyper-local journalism alive and thriving.
If you believe in the importance of local news and want to reach our vast audience, we invite you to partner with us. For advertising opportunities, contactadvertise@folsomtimes.com.
